[Histonet] PCNA versus Ki67

[Dana Settembre]

We use Ki67 and have rarely used PCNA.  What is "go"?   Is that a
phase?
Dana Settembre
University Hospital - UDMNJ, Newark, NJ

>>> "Connolly, Brett M" <brett_connolly <@t> merck.com> 10/24/2005 5:44:40
PM >>>
I have been a big proponent of using Ki67 instead of PCNA as a more
accurate
proliferation marker after reading that PCNA may in fact carry over
into G0.
Recently, some of my colleagues have been clamoring for PCNA.

I'd be interested to hear which marker other labs are using.

Thanks,
Brett

Brett M. Connolly, Ph.D.
Merck & Co., Inc.
MRL, Imaging Research
WP-44K
PO Box 4
West Point, PA 19486
PH 215-652-2501
fax. 215-993-6803
e-mail. brett_connolly <@t> merck.com 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD
and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary
copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use
of the individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the
intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your
system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet