[Histonet] Formalin Fixation times for IHC samples
madbaza <@t> powerup.com.au
Wed Feb 23 16:42:15 CST 2005
I find the major impediment to good quality Immunohistochemistry is turn
around times, which has been a buzz word here in Australia for a number of
years. The result of this management tool has led to poorly fixed and
processed tissue samples that are unable to withstand the harsh treatment of
Thanks to Murphy's Law, we usually find that the most vital block for
diagnosis is always the one that is poorly preserved.
We receive material for Immunohistochemistry from a large number of
hospitals in Queensland (Australia). Unfortunately there is no uniformity in
the way specimens are fixed or processed by these referring laboratories.
Both lymph nodes and breast tissue are the major specimens affected by under
With lymph nodes the peripheral staining is excellent but the morphology of
the centre is compromised.
The central structures of these specimens have not been strengthened by
fixation and as a result the morphology is damaged by heat retrieval.
With breast specimens there is an increase risk of tissue lifting from the
Try to convince Pathologists that fixation is the problem is just about
We place control material, which has received at least 24 hours fixation on
the same slide. The control material is always perfect and the Pathologist
always concurs but questions why the test morphology is damaged.
It's great to get pathology reports out quickly but at what diagnostic cost.
How many other laboratories experience this problem?
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Katri
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:23 PM
To: Anne C Lewin; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Formalin Fixation times for IHC samples
I think you are doing well with your protocol. Although I don't think
"overfixation" is as a big problem any more with the advent of different
HIER protocols with various buffers being used. Under fixation (less than 24
hours) can be a bigger problem with certain antibodies like Her-2, ER and PR
to mention few. This concept of over fixation is a remnant from the time
prior to HIER, when we all had a problem trying to demonstrate many antigens
with weaker retrievals (proteolytic enzymes). The heat over 60C was actually
banned from any immunohistochemistry protocols 20 years ago.
My two cents worth...
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne C Lewin" <anne.lewin <@t> bms.com>
To: <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:28 AM
Subject: [Histonet] Formalin Fixation times for IHC samples
> Could I get a general concensus from Histoland about the amount of time
> needed to fix a sample for IHC without over-fixing? My training/journal
> searches have led me to believe that the longer a sample is in
> formalin, the stronger the protiens are cross-linked, and the more
> difficult it is to break those bonds with antigen retreival and get your
> antibody to the target. I generally tell the scientists in my
> department to fix overnight (most samples vary from about the size of a
> pea to a lima bean), and then to transfer to 70% Ethanol for me to
> process for paraffin. The total time in fixative tends to be around 24
> hours. Morphology has always been great, and my IHC's work well. This
> question is mainly for my information, since I have used the same tissue
> prep protocol for a few years now, I want to make sure I am keeping up
> with current opinions.
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet