[Histonet] Resolution of 37% case
pmarcum <@t> polysciences.com
Fri Feb 4 15:45:09 CST 2005
I knew he (the surgeon) couldn't be wrong and some one from histology would
get blamed somehow. Glad to hear the specimen was salvagable and the
patient did not suffer.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu]On Behalf Of Linda
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:21 PM
> To: histonet <@t> pathology.swmed.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] Resolution of 37% case
> Dear all,
> Thanks to all that responded to my question about a surgeon putting a
> liver biopsy in "formaldehyde". All of the responses lightened the day.
> And now the results are in.
> 1. The "meek" (formerly cranky) surgeon admitted there must have been
> a misunderstanding between himself and his surgery tech team, but the
> histo tech. should have known that there was a misunderstanding and
> should have not sent the 37%.
> 2. The specimen survived abet some formalin pigment.
> Thanks again to all!
> Linda Blazek, HT (ASCP)
> Department of Pathology
> Children's Medical Center
> Dayton, Ohio 45404
> (937) 641-3358
> fax (937)641-5482
> blazekl <@t> childrensdayton.org
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet