[Histonet] Resolution of 37% case
Pamela Marcum
pmarcum <@t> polysciences.com
Fri Feb 4 15:45:09 CST 2005
I knew he (the surgeon) couldn't be wrong and some one from histology would
get blamed somehow. Glad to hear the specimen was salvagable and the
patient did not suffer.
Thanks,
Pam Marcum
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu]On Behalf Of Linda
> Blazek
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:21 PM
> To: histonet <@t> pathology.swmed.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] Resolution of 37% case
>
>
> Dear all,
> Thanks to all that responded to my question about a surgeon putting a
> liver biopsy in "formaldehyde". All of the responses lightened the day.
> And now the results are in.
>
> 1. The "meek" (formerly cranky) surgeon admitted there must have been
> a misunderstanding between himself and his surgery tech team, but the
> histo tech. should have known that there was a misunderstanding and
> should have not sent the 37%.
> 2. The specimen survived abet some formalin pigment.
> Thanks again to all!
>
>
>
>
> Linda Blazek, HT (ASCP)
> Department of Pathology
> Children's Medical Center
> Dayton, Ohio 45404
> (937) 641-3358
> fax (937)641-5482
> blazekl <@t> childrensdayton.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
More information about the Histonet
mailing list