[Histonet] Is TUNEL as waste of time?
pruegg <@t> ihctech.net
Mon Apr 11 10:39:36 CDT 2005
In my experience, with what we were doing Tunnel was not helpful at all. We
could not distinguish apoptosis from necrosis. We had a lot of necrosis so
this was useless to us. Cleaved Caspase 3 in my hands seemed only to label
the cells undergoing apoptosis. CC3 is cheaper and more consistently
reliable in my experience. Note: I had been paying over $600. for a very
small amount of the CC3 antibody from Cell Signaling but just recently tried
the same clone from BioCare and found it to be just as good at about 1/4 the
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Kelly D
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 6:12 AM
To: Satoshi Akima
Cc: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Is TUNEL as waste of time?
What about apoptotic CK-18 antibody? It is supposed to be more sensitive
than TUNEL. You can use it with Ki-67 antobody.
Satoshi Akima wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am looking into the Roche TUNEL kit and have been getting various
> opinions. Some say it is easy and reviewers will ask for a TUNEL stain
> in preference to other methods such as staining for caspase-3. However
> many people find that they get non-specific staining and even where
> things seem to have gone well you get a great many cells that seem
> absolutely healthy staining up positive.
> Do people think that TUNEL is a sham technique that ivory tower
> reviewers who never get their hands dirty in the lab ask for, never
> realising how hopeless the technique is? Or is it still a genuinely
> useful tool?
> Toshi Akima
> PhD Student
> Centre for Transplantation and Renal Research
> Westmead Millenium Institute
> Sydney, Australia
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet