[Histonet] Re: Tissue Arrays

[Janice A Mahoney]

I'd be interested in knowing if anyone has had an issue with false
positive staining of Her-2-neu on breast needle biopsies.  Any ideas on
why this happens?
Thanks,
Jan

Janice Mahoney
Histology/Cytology Coordinator
Alegent Health Laboratory
Phone (402)717-2889
Fax (402)717-5231

"There's NO excuse for Domestic Violence"
     Crisis Lines:
         Omaha YWCA   402-345-7273
         Sarpy County     1-800-523-3666
         Council Bluffs     1-712-328-0266     
 NE's Statewide          1-800-876-6238


>>> "Histo Jock" <histojock <@t> hotmail.com> 05/27/2004 11:13:31 AM >>>

Making tissue arrays by re-embedding affects staining "down the road" 
because of basic chemistry.

Each time a specimen is exposed to air there will be some loss of some

antigens and nucleic acids due to oxidation from atmospheric ozone,
acids, 
etc circulating in the lab. Not all antigens are affected, not every 
antibody has a problem with it, but it does happen and is well
recognized in 
tissue array labs.

Many labs have documented this phenomenon. Most notable is David Rimm's
lab 
at Yale that has made an art out of preserving antigens on tissue
arrays by 
storing them in a special cabinet filled with nitrogen gas. They see 
dramatic losses in staining intensity in sections left in air for just
a few 
days.

The problem with reheating tissue array cores is that this oxidation
effect 
is grossly accelerated by the higher temperatures and air is allowed to

penetrate farther into the core once the paraffin has softened from the

heat. Some labs have stopped anealing cores into tissue array blocks at
37 
degrees because they see a loss in staining. I have had presonal
experience 
with loss of in-situ signal in blocks annealed at 32 degrees versus
ones 
kept at room temp. I remember at least one study that shows slides
stored at 
higher tempuatures (25 degrees, I think) lose some anitgens in fairly
short 
order.

If you haven't seen a problem it's probably because of the antibodies
you're 
using. Many polyclonals will do fine, many monoclonals won't. The more
the 
heat+time+exposure to the atmosphere the more the effect. As with
everything 
else in histotechnology it just depends on your specific
circumstances.

The basic message is that less physical manipulation of a specimen is
ALWAYS 
better than more. There's no reason to heat a specimen to make an array
when 
you can do it perfectly well at room temp. Re-embedded tissue arrays
may 
work great for a lot of things, but experience shows that they do have

problems in some applications.

HistoJock


>Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 04:49:52 +0000
>From: "Thom Jensen" <tissuearray <@t> hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [Histonet] Tissue Array
>To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
>Message-ID: <BAY12-F101goxY9DCBP0000aa9b <@t> hotmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
>   How  does  melting paraffin  embedded tissues effect the staining
down
>   the  road?   That  doesn't make since.  I have made dozens of
multiple
>   punch  arrays  by  melting the punches and embedding them as you
would
>   normally  embed  tissues and it has never effected the staining,
"DOWN
>   THE ROAD....."
>
>   Thom

   >>From: "Histo Jock" <histojock <@t> hotmail.com>
   >>To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
   >>Subject: Re: [Histonet] Tissue Array
   >>Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 20:03:31 -0400
   >>
   >>
   >>You might want to be careful using Zymed's arrays. I don't think
   >>they are made with the standard coring method. Rather, I think
that
   >>they use some sort of melting / re-embedding process that can
effect
   >>staining down the road.
   >>
   >>HistoJock

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with the new version of MSN Messenger! Download today
- 
it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ 


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet