[Histonet] Histology bench ergonomics

Margaret Blount mab70 <@t> medschl.cam.ac.uk
Fri May 14 02:29:09 CDT 2004


For what it is worth, I have worked at both heights and prefer desk (30")
height - it's more comfortable. After all comfort is part of ergonomics. 


Margaret

Margaret Blount
Chief Technician
Clinical Biochemistry
University of Cambridge
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 2QR 
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu]On Behalf Of
Jackie.O'Connor <@t> abbott.com
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:12 PM
To: histonet <@t> pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Histology bench ergonomics


Does anyone have any data or information on bench height for microtomy?  I 
know a lot of people cut at routine lab bench height (36" I think) with no 
trouble, and some cut at desk high benches (30").  Is there any 
safety/ergonomic guidelines or opinions as to which is better for 
microtomy?  I actually prefer desk height, so I can keep my feet on the 
floor - I'm just wondering if there is anything official out there - I've 
looked at a couple of sites, but can't find a lot to support my idea that 
desk height is better.

Thanks - 
Jackie O'
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




More information about the Histonet mailing list