FW: [Histonet] quantitative iron testing/processor solutions

[MGomez <@t> ameripath.com]

There are only a few people I know who use eosin and or hematoxylin in their
alcohols without any problems (that
does not hinder quantitative iron and/or heavy metal analysis).

Milton

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinnie Della Speranza [mailto:dellav <@t> musc.edu] 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 1:19 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu; MaureenHoops <@t> texashealth.org
Subject: Re: [Histonet] quantitative iron testing/processor solutions

I've spoken with our Clinical Chemistry director about this issue. She
informed me that the assay for iron is extremely sensitive and difficult to
perform while avoiding contamination of any sort. Indeed she was not at all
surprised that is problem occurred. She further mentioned that even if we
had available a detailed analysis of the dye listing all impurities, any
trace iron, even in the range of 0.0001 % would be sufficient to affect the
results.


the bigger problem is how to determine whether any dye source will contain
iron impurities. I don't think the issue is specific to methylene blue and
probably could result from any dye. 
since there is no iron in the molecular structure of methylene blue (or
eosin for that matter) the contaminant likely arises in the impurities that
accompanying the dyestuff in powdered form. any solution of the dye would
also contain those same impurities. if you dye is labeled to be 80% pure,
this essentially means that 20% of the stuff in the bottle is something else
that we usually are not interested in in terms of the staining we desire.

I don't know if there is any simple method we might employ to assay for or
remove the contaminants accompanying the dye in the bottle. I suspect not,
but I would be grateful to any chemists on the list for their comments

I suspect that there will be no simple answer to Dana's question however it
is a really good one for those of us who sometimes utilize paraffin embedded
tissues for this iron assay.

Vinnie

 

Vinnie Della Speranza
Manager for Anatomic Pathology Services
Medical University of South Carolina
165 Ashley Avenue  Suite 309
Charleston, SC 29425
Ph: 843-792-6353
fax: 843-792-8974

>>> "Hoops, Maureen" <MaureenHoops <@t> texashealth.org> 06/18/04 10:06AM >>>

Our lab recently had a case sent out for quantitative iron analysis that
yielded abnormal results.  The pathologists requested we submit a sample of
the methylene blue dye we had been using to color our processing alcohols.
Based upon the sample assays, the methylene blue was the cause of the
elevated metal levels. This raises several questions --
Do other laboratories utilize methylene blue coloring in their processor
solutions?
If so, have you ever experienced a similar situation with heavy metal
testing?
Does anyone use Fast Green (Light Green) for a coloring agent in the
alcohols of their processor?  If so, does it interfere with testing?
Does anyone know of an agent we can use to color our alcohols (tissues) that
does not hinder quantitative iron and/or heavy metal analysis?
Thanks for your help
Dana



The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended
only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing, or using the information.  Please
contact the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the original
message from your system.

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet