[Histonet] PAS with and without Diastase for glycogen

Celebre Julia celebrej <@t> HHSC.CA
Fri Jan 16 09:05:56 CST 2004


Here's one idea..... 
Have you thought of trying a composite block made up of liver, cervix and
even kidney? 
That way all bases are covered...

> ----------
> From: 	Barnhart, Tammy[SMTP:Tbarnhart <@t> primecare.org]
> Sent: 	Friday, January 16, 2004 9:52 AM
> To: 	'FreidaC <@t> aol.com'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: 	RE: [Histonet] PAS with and without Diastase for glycogen
> 
> Thank you all for your ideas, let me elaborate...
>  
> Our pathologists won't except cervix for a control, they want a liver
> control. When we use cervix, the stain seems to work great.  I have not
> tried skin or kidney, but maybe I can get them to except them as controls.
> We have tried spitting, it works best.  I don't feel it is a problem with
> our procedure, because it seems to work well on cervix and the Schiff's
> reaction seems to be very strong.  Freida, you may have hit the nail on
> the
> head with your comment on glycogen storage in the liver.  Autopsy tissue
> is
> about all the liver we can get.  Could be that we will never get good,
> consistent results with liver controls.  However, in my previous lab we
> did
> get consistent staining with liver.  That is what has me so perplexed.  I
> think I will try the kidney.  If alot of you respond that liver will never
> make a good control, maybe I can use that as proof to the pathologists
> that
> we need to use the cervix control.  Any other ideas....please let me know.
>  
>  
> [Barnhart, Tammy]  -----Original Message-----
> From: FreidaC <@t> aol.com [mailto:FreidaC <@t> aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:21 AM
> To: Tbarnhart <@t> primecare.org; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] PAS with and without Diastase for glycogen
> 
> 
> 
> Tammy:
>  
> Many livers do not contain a lot of glycogen - especially autopsy livers,
> because few are well nourished and have a lot of stored glycogen at the
> time
> of death.  A better control in my opinion is a section of cervix
> containing
> both endo- and ecto- cervix.  The stratified squamous epithelium of the
> ectocervix contains glycogen which will disappear with diastase digestion,
> while the mucous glands in the endocervix do not contain glycogen, but
> rather mucin that will be positive with the PAS.  This will not disappear
> with diastase digestion.  This is also easier control tissue to find in
> most
> institutions.
>  
> Freida Carson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:This e-mail message is for sole use of intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender
> by replying to this e-mail and destroy/delete all copies of this e-mail
> message.
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> 
This information is directed in confidence solely to the person named above
and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed.  Therefore, this
information should be considered strictly confidential.  If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately via a
return email for further direction. Thank you for your assistance.






More information about the Histonet mailing list