[Histonet] Immuno Controls
pkromund <@t> gundluth.org
pkromund <@t> gundluth.org
Fri May 30 12:51:06 CDT 2008
I agree with this completely & this is the practice in our lab.
Pam
"Dana Spears"
<dspears <@t> mmci.org
> To
Sent by: "Mark A Burton" <mburton1 <@t> bu.edu>,
histonet-bounces@ <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
lists.utsouthwest cc
ern.edu
Subject
RE: [Histonet] Immuno Controls
05/29/2008 04:29
PM
Histonetters,
In my opinion, it is always better for patient safety to have the control
and the patient tissue on the same slide - no matter what platform you are
running (or even if you were running them manually!). I've used BioGenex,
DAKO, Ventana, and manual methods and I feel it is better for the patient
AND cheaper if the control is on the same slide. No matter how you are
running your IHCs, there is the slight possibility that the instrument
could falter or you could forget to apply a reagent to a particular slide -
better to have the control on there and you KNOW it worked. Sure, there is
the argument that you go through more control blocks, but if you align your
chuck every time and are careful, that additional tissue is a small price
to pay for better patient care!!!
Dana Spears, HTL(ASCP)
Anatomic Pathology Manager
Methodist Medical Center
(309) 672-4930 (office)
(309) 255-7214 (cell)
dspears <@t> mmci.org
>>> "Mark A Burton" <mburton1 <@t> bu.edu> 5/29/2008 3:15 PM >>>
I'm sure this discussion must be in the archives but my understanding of
how
the Ventana Benchmark works is that there is a plunger that presses on a
dispenser bottle to deliver the antibodies and reagents to the slide. If
the
dispenser bottle is not primed or if there is some type of interference
than
you would not get any antibody or reagent delivered to your slide. Without
a
control on each slide, there is no way to know. Is this a legitimate
argument? or is the amount of time and tissue needed to accomplish this too
costly?
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J
Buesa
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:30 PM
To: Happel, James F.; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Immuno Controls
I used the DAKO autostainer and the cases' sections were placed in slides
already containing a tissue control section in a way that both were
"stained" simultaneously.
I only used one single control for a whole series of cases when doing
Her2neu, or for research studies for our residents.
René J.
"Happel, James F." <JHAPPEL <@t> PARTNERS.ORG> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
NOTICE: This message is a PRIVATE communication. This e-mail may contain
confidential or proprietary information that may be considered legally
privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected the e-mail, please notify
the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient,
you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely
on this e-mail, and should immediately delete it from your computer system.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list