[Histonet] Shur/Mark cassette engraver

[Pizi, Dave]

Dr. Bansal

We have 2 Shurmark cassette engravers and we have pretty good luck with
Richard Allan cassettes.  It sounds like the stop that the cassette rests
against when they are being labeld needs adjusting.  Also a new sytlus makes
the numbers and letters crisp and easier to read.

Dave Pizi
Carolinas HealthCare System
Charlotte, NC

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Bansal, Meera [SMTP:Meera.Bansal <@t> chsli.org]
> Sent:	Monday, March 08, 2004 12:00 PM
> To:	histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject:	[Histonet] Shur/Mark cassette engraver
> 
> We have a Shur/Mark 32 cassette engraver linked to our Copath v 2.2
> anatomic pathology software. We have been using the Simport Histosette II
> casettes. Sometimes we find that the subdesignations for the cassettes do
> not fit correctly on the face of the cassette and part of it goes over the
> bottom edge. As a result,  D1, O1 and Q1 all end up looking the same!
> Anyone else out there using the Shur/Mark? Which cassettes do you use?
> Thanks for your help.
> Meera Bansal,MD
> Mercy Medical Centre
> Rockville Centre, NY.
> Tel 516-705-2150
> Fax 516-705-2691
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-----------------------------------------
This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information it contains. Thank you.