[Histonet] Buffer vs Water
Amos Brooks
amosbrooks <@t> earthlink.net
Wed Apr 28 17:06:24 CDT 2004
Hi,
You would be better off using buffer (PBS or TBS). The reason as
it was described to me was that the antibodies are more likely to locate
their binding sites if they don't have a lot of tonicity and VanDerwalls
force induced agitation of the solutions. The pH of the washes should be as
close to the pH of the antibody solution. If the antibody has a strong
affinity to the antigen then you may not notice any difference. It becomes
important when there isn't a strong attraction between the two.
Hope this helps,
Amos Brooks
At 10:14 AM 4/28/2004, you wrote:
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:07:09 -0400
>From: Kristopher.Kalleberg <@t> unilever.com
>Subject: [Histonet] (no subject)
>To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>Message-ID: <iss.ca.408e933d.280.bb <@t> edg-001.ed.u4267.unilever.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>When performing IHC, and the stain is combined with water, are better results
>achieved when rinsed with water or should PBS be used
More information about the Histonet
mailing list